Attribution, Ownership, And Licensing
This page is the public family-level summary for DiscussionBridge ownership,
attribution, and component licensing. Each component repository’s LICENSE file
is the authority for that component and overrides any inconsistent summary.
Public Summary
Section titled “Public Summary”DiscussionBridge is an independent product brand owned and operated within the WebSynergetics umbrella. It is made by CodeWorksLabs, the WebSynergetics maker/studio, and maintained by Phil Henry.
DiscussionBridge for Discourse is the Discourse plugin and receiver. Focused
platform components connect Astro, Ghost, Hugo, Statamic, and WordPress through
the DiscussionBridge Adapter Protocol. The Bridge is only the name of the
dedicated public demonstration at bridge.demo.discussionbridge.dev.
Recommended short public attribution:
DiscussionBridge is made by CodeWorksLabs, a WebSynergetics property.Ownership
Section titled “Ownership”WebSynergetics is the current owner and operating umbrella unless a later controlling agreement or repository record says otherwise. CodeWorksLabs is the maker/studio; that role does not replace the owner or the distinct DiscussionBridge product identity.
Phil Henry is the current human maintainer/operator. AI tools, including Codex, may assist with development and documentation, but they are not listed as copyright owners, legal authors, maintainers, or inventors.
The human operator and organization remain responsible for review, testing, security, licensing, publication, and maintenance.
Component Licenses
Section titled “Component Licenses”DiscussionBridge components use the MIT License except where a component explicitly states otherwise. DiscussionBridge for Discourse is the GPL-2.0-or-later exception.
| Component | License | Authoritative record |
|---|---|---|
| DiscussionBridge Adapter Protocol | MIT | The Alpha.21 working candidate contains the license; the public repository LICENSE becomes authoritative when that candidate is published |
| DiscussionBridge for Discourse | GPL-2.0-or-later | Repository license |
| DiscussionBridge for Astro | MIT | Package license |
| DiscussionBridge for Ghost | MIT | Repository license |
| DiscussionBridge for Hugo | MIT | Repository license |
| DiscussionBridge for Statamic | MIT | Repository license |
| DiscussionBridge for WordPress | MIT | Repository license |
| DiscussionBridge documentation | MIT | Documentation repository license |
The Adapter Protocol must not be described as a downloadable MIT-licensed
Alpha.21 release until its coherent tag, artifact, and authoritative public
LICENSE are published.
See also the public third-party provenance inventory.
Copyable Attribution Templates
Section titled “Copyable Attribution Templates”Use the exact component license in repository and package metadata. Do not copy a family-wide “MIT except…” statement into a component that should name one license precisely.
MIT Components
Section titled “MIT Components”Copyright (c) 2026 WebSynergeticsLicense: MITSPDX-License-Identifier: MITMaintainer: Phil HenryDevelopment: Human-directed, AI-assisted development using Codex and related tools.DiscussionBridge For Discourse
Section titled “DiscussionBridge For Discourse”Copyright (c) 2026 WebSynergeticsLicense: GPL-2.0-or-laterSPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-laterMaintainer: Phil HenryDevelopment: Human-directed, AI-assisted development using Codex and related tools.These templates supplement rather than replace the complete license text that must ship with the component.
Why MIT Is The Default
Section titled “Why MIT Is The Default”MIT is a practical fit for integration components intended to be installed, audited, modified, and combined with independently licensed publishing platforms. Its enduring conditions are deliberately small: copies or substantial portions must retain the copyright notice and permission text, and the software is supplied without warranty.
MIT does not transfer ownership of DiscussionBridge, grant rights to its name or branding, require publication of modifications, or promise support, fitness, security, or compatibility.
Why DiscussionBridge For Discourse Is GPL
Section titled “Why DiscussionBridge For Discourse Is GPL”DiscussionBridge for Discourse is distributed under GPL-2.0-or-later, so its source and redistribution obligations follow that repository’s license. That component license does not silently relicense separately distributed adapters or the public Adapter Protocol merely because they communicate through the shared contract.
DiscussionBridge for WordPress remains MIT. The official WordPress.org Detailed Plugin Guidelines require directory-hosted plugins and included material to use a GPL-compatible license and strongly recommend GPLv2-or-later. MIT is GPL-compatible. Changing the WordPress component to GPL would therefore be a deliberate licensing decision, not a correction required for compatibility with that policy. Policy wording was checked September 24, 2026; recheck it before a future WordPress.org submission.
Copyright Notice
Section titled “Copyright Notice”The current ownership record supports:
Copyright (c) 2026 WebSynergeticsThe name does not by itself assert a particular corporate form. If the legal owner name, trade-name form, or ownership agreement changes, update the controlling governance record, repository licenses, package metadata, and public attribution together.
AI-Assisted Development
Section titled “AI-Assisted Development”DiscussionBridge uses human-directed, AI-assisted development. The public transparency convention does not change copyright ownership or license terms. Code, documentation, dependencies, generated material, and release artifacts still require ordinary human review and verification.
Never place secrets, credentials, private account values, personal data, or protected operational details in public attribution or provenance records.
Third-Party Names And Non-Affiliation
Section titled “Third-Party Names And Non-Affiliation”Astro, Starlight, Discourse, Ghost, Hugo, Statamic, and WordPress belong to their respective owners. DiscussionBridge is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by, or officially connected to those projects unless a future written agreement says otherwise.
When referencing a third-party project or example:
- link to the source;
- describe it as a reference rather than an endorsement;
- avoid copying substantial text, imagery, branding, or proprietary material; and
- prefer original DiscussionBridge examples.
Demo And Media Provenance
Section titled “Demo And Media Provenance”Demo content is original project material unless its source says otherwise. For new examples and media:
- do not use customer, private, or personal content;
- cite specifically adapted public sources;
- confirm rights before distributing logos, screenshots, fonts, images, data, or other non-code assets;
- record public, non-sensitive provenance in
docs/THIRD_PARTY_PROVENANCE.json; and - retain any confidential purchase receipt, permission, or legal evidence in the protected governance record referenced by the public inventory.
The public inventory should identify what ships and its usable provenance without exposing private agreements, credentials, or personal data.